The 2009 Stimulus Bill Won't Stimulate Education

The Senate's Version Cuts Billions From Proposed School Funding

© Alex Sharp

Feb 7, 2009
Education Will Not Get a Hand Up from the Senate, Neubie (Flickr Creative Commons License)
While schools cut back on paper, field trips, and entire departments, CEO's are spending their bailout money on bonuses. Guess who is overflowing with taxpayer money?

As news reports flood readers with reports that the Senate has a revised stimulus package they can agree on, taxpayers need to ask what the Senate cut to make the overwhelming spending more palatable. Then again, maybe taxpayers do not need to ask what was cut.

Taxpayers they can drive by almost any school and see the answer to "what was cut?" in the old buildings, old playground equipment, and old buses. Maybe they can ask their children how many kids are in their classes and realize that class sizes are growing, due to teacher cut-backs, and ask about special programs, such as gifted education, and educational field trips. Those programs, too, are facing cuts due to budgetary concerns.

What the Senate Cut from the Stimulus Bill

According to Time Magazine's Jay Newton-Small,"Most of the cuts that led to the deal — about $85 billion — came from reduced spending on school construction, teacher funding and higher education." ("Barely Bipartisan But a Senate Stimulus Deal is Done", February 7, 2009). Greg Hitt and Jonathan Weisman were even more specific in the their February 7, 2009 Wall Street Journal article, "Senate Reaches $780 Billion Compromise Package". They say Senate cuts include:

  • $98 million for school nutrition
  • $3.5 billion for school construction
  • "At least half the funds to subsidize state education spending were eliminated"
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  • Funding for computerize health records "is all but gone"
  • Funds for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Make Work Pay payroll-tax holiday is dramatically reduced
  • The child tax credit for the working poor was "also trimmed".

That leaves $780 billion left to stimulate the economy, but it will be higher after already approved measures (such as the $15000 tax credit for homeowners) are added into the total bill.

What Concerned Citizens Can Do About The Lack of Education Funding

Much of the support generated for the Stimulus bill came from people who supported the funds going to education. In one of Move On's call-to-action emails, Noah T. Winer asked Move On participants to write letters to the editors of local papers, and included the fact that the stimulus bill as proposed at the time, would prevent "literally hundreds of thousands of teacher layoffs" and said the bill "doubles funding for the Department of Education."

It is important that anyone who supported the bill because of the potential in education funding contact their senators to let those elected leaders know that education is still a priority for the people who understand the value of an educated society.

What the Senate Allowed in the Stimulus Bill

Almost every section of society not taking place on school grounds will benefit from the bill, which has some admirable expenditures. Recipients of proposed funds include:

  • Byrne Justice Assistance Grants
  • Community Oriented Policing Services
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • Department of Energy

Details of the bill are emerging, and the Senate will vote on the bill by February 10th, but they are hoping for a weekend vote.


The copyright of the article The 2009 Stimulus Bill Won't Stimulate Education in American Affairs is owned by Alex Sharp. Permission to republish The 2009 Stimulus Bill Won't Stimulate Education in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Education Will Not Get a Hand Up from the Senate, Neubie (Flickr Creative Commons License)
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Feb 7, 2009 6:23 AM
Lisa Russell :
Interesting. We spend more per capita on education and get the worst results, compared to other nations. So I don't think throwing money at schools would really have stimulated the economy, or helped test scores. That said, Your basic assumption that everyone in America can look out their window at dilapidated schools is a false one. In Milwaukee, for example, they have 15 vacant school buildings, a large surplus of property, and no plans for construction, yet under the original plan they would have received $88.6 million. The funds that were cut were earmarked for construction & nutrition, not for teacher salaries. More playgrounds, buses and buildings won't solve our country's education woes.
Feb 8, 2009 5:40 AM
Guest :
That may be true for Wilwaukee but St. Louis has to close 30 schools. Some because of enrollment but the majority because the schools are too old. Take a look at urban schools throughout the US.
Jul 26, 2009 7:40 PM
Guest :
Aren't the states and local government that these schools that are closing in for this reason (too old) responsible somewhat for this problem? Its my understanding that many times this kind of thing happens because of funds mismanagement by local school boards as well as environmental impacts. I feel throwing money at the schools isn't going to solve anything either until there are responsible leaders in education that understand how to manage the funds already administered. Which of course a lot of them inherit mishandled budgets and without proper funding/failing economy I'm sure it is nearly impossible to rebound from someone else's mistakes,oversights, bad judgement calls, or just plain ignorance. I find these days there way too many under qualified leaders or administrators that are able to land these positions because of friends and favors and they really just don't know what their doing when it comes to handling money for their school systems. Some school systems make it ok while others don't. No matter what, teachers will always be under paid. Especially as long as many are not only teaching the children as well as standing in as parents to many of them. The number one problem with education is apathetic parenting. It is a common disease that has taken over our nation by storm. For just as many classrooms, teachers, busses, playgrounds, text books, and better nutrition that is needed in each of our schools is a parent that is needed to give their children support with school. Help with homework or reading to them. Helping them keep up with their supplies and seeing them off in the morning with love. For just as many children that don't have this support at a young age there is 2 more that have dropped out or just never go to college. Just on my mind. N. Baldwin MS
3 Comments